|
| |
The diagnostic and therapeutic use of 131I in thyroid disorders
is wide spread due to the fact that few adverse effects have been reported.
A large amount of studies have addressed the hazards of 131I
and some conclusions could be drawn. Firstly, the number of individuals
under study in the diagnostic and hyperthyroid cohorts are probably sufficiently
large to give reliable results. Secondly, the only patients, with the exception
of stomach cancer among hyperthyroid patients, that show significantly
elevated risks after 131I exposure, are those treated for a
thyroid cancer.
The dose to organs other than thyroid from diagnostic activities of
131I for medical reasons to draw any firm conclusions. In the
Swedish study, approximately 2,400 individuals were younger than 20 years
of age at exposure (4) and three thyroid cancers were found, giving a non-significant
increased risk of 1.69 (95% CI 0.35-4.93).
There is an increased thyroid cancer risk associ-ated with low doses
of external gamma radiation in those exposed at younger ages and the risk
decreases with increasing age, but so far no study has found a significantly
increased risk of thyroid cancer in any population above the age of 30
years at exposure, regardless of type of exposure.
There seems to be little evidence of a carcinogenic effect of 131I
after treatment for hyperthyroidism despite organ doses shown to be sufficient
to induce cancer in the A bomb survivors. This could be explained by the
lower carcinogenic effect of 131I compared to external gamma
radiation as shown in epidemiological and experimental studies (10,40).
Other studies contradict these results at least for doses lower than 4
Sv (41). Iodine-131 also seems to have a lower effect than short-lived
isotopes as 132I, which emit higher energy beta particles at
higher dose-rates (42). The lack of an increased risk of thyroid cancer
among those treated for hyperthyroidism is probably explained by the high
doses having a cell-killing, rather than carcinogenic effect on the thyroid
gland.
The studies of adverse effects of 131I on thyroid cancer
patients are small and difficult to interpret. Use of 131I was
not convincingly linked to elevated risks of leukemia or cancer since we
were unable to detect a increased SIRs over time and with increasing organ
doses. The overall risk in the Swedish study was 1.43 (95% CI 1.07-1.87)
for the first 10 years and did not change for the following years (32).
The same pattern was seen for organs considered to receive quit high doses
from 131I (i.e. salivary gland, stomach, intestines, bladder).
A significant excess was seen for salivary glands and these findings were
based on three cases, one of whom also received external radiotherapy towards
the neck region.
An increased risk of tumors in the adrenal gland was noted for both
patients treated with 131I and those treated with surgery, suggesting
an underlying predisposition or common etiological factor. Seven of the
11 endocrine tumors in the study were pheochromocytomas and three parathyroid
adenoma. In 1961, Sipple (43) noted the coexistence of medullary thyroid
carcinoma, pheochromocytoma and parathyroid adenoma. Since five of the
patients with pheochromocytoma had a medullary carcinoma, this might indicate
that the knowledge among physicians to search for other endocrine tumors
in thyroid cancer patients could contribute to our findings. The role of
individual differences in genetic background as a modifier of risk is yet
to be discovered. The risk was significantly elevated for kidney cancer
(SIR=3.00, n=7; Table 1) but not for bladder cancer (SIR=1.61, n=4) despite
the fact that the dose to the bladder is approximately eight times higher
than for the kidney, and one explanation could be the screening for pheochromocytomas.
The bone marrow is known to be on of the most radiosensitive tissues
in the body, besides breast, lung, and thyroid (7). Several epidemiological
studies have found an association between ionizing radiation and leukemia,
including reports on patients with cervical, endometrial, and breast cancer,
and patients with menstrual disorders and ankylosing spondylitis (44).
The association of leukemia and 131I treatment for thyroid cancer
reported in several studies is, although based on few patients, noteworthy
(Table 1) (29-32). The risk must, however, be discussed in the light of
the therapeutically benefits of the treatment as always in cancer treatment
regardless of underlying disease.
As a conclusion, the present results should not cause any restrictions
to the use of 131I for patients with suspected or diagnosed
thyroid disorders. The only concern should be younger patients since we
have little information on the carcinogenic potential of 131I
in children. It could also be concluded that the sharply increased mortality
among hyperthyroid patients the first year after diagnosis is not related
to the 131I treatment but the underlying disease, urging the
physicians to start treatment as soon as possible. As always radiotherapy
should follow the ALARA principle, i.e. the administered dose should be
As Low As Reasonably Achievable.
|
|