|
| |
Capezzone et al., Pisa, Italy, did a retrospective study in 464
patients who were treated with different doses of 131-I for post-surgical
thyroid-remnant ablation in the period between 1970 to 1996. Group 1 (187 patients)
were treated with 30 mCi 131-I, group 2 (148 patients) with 31–80 mCi 131-I, and
group 3 (129 patients) with >80 mCi 131-I. The total percentage of successful
ablation was 65 %. No difference was found in success rate between the three
treatment groups. A significant correlation was found between successful ablation
and lower basal serum Tg and lower 131-I tracer dose (50µCi vs 1 mCi) administered
before ablation. The authors found that the dose of 30 mCi of 131-I
resulted in a successful ablation in 84 % of patients when this dose is not preceded
by a diagnostic whole body scanning even with 1 mCi tracer dose of 131-I as
this dose may cause stunning.
Several studies were reported using recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) in patients with
thyroid carcinoma.
Thus, Lippi et al., Pisa, Italy, showed that rhTSH can induce 131-I
uptake in most metastatic lesions of 25 selected patients with differentiated thyroid
carcinoma. After a mean follow-up period of 16 months, 16 % of patients were cured
by one treatment. rhTSH was safe and swelling and pain of metastatic tissue were
experienced by several patients be it of shorter duration than after stimulation by
endogenous TSH.
Bournaud et al., Lyon, France, reported their experience in 8
patients treated with rhTSH before administration of 131-I and conclude
that in this small study rhTSH is of definite value in treatment of functional
metastases of thyroid carcinoma.
Barbaro et al., Livorno, Italy, tested the efficacy of 30 mCi 131-I
in ablation of postsurgical thyroid remnants in 5 patients with “low risk”
differentiated thyroid carcinoma by pretreatment with rhTSH . This regimen resulted
in complete ablation of remnants in all patients with a single dose of 131-I.
Kalarritou et al., Athens, Greece, tested in 19 patients after treatment for
differentiated thyroid carcinoma if rhTSH stimulated serum Tg (s-Tg) can serve as a
single method for detection of any persistent tumor or of metastases. In 12/19
patients basal Tg levels were found at or < 0.5 ng/ml showing no response to
rhTSH. Of the remaining (7/19) patients with a higher serum Tg all basal parameters
showed stimulation after rhTSH and 4/7 also had a positive WBS and MRI. In the 3/7
patients without positive visualization of any tumor, basal Tg levels were still
very low (0.5–1.1 ng/ml). Comment: Although the patients sample is small these
results suggest that rhTSH stimulation, if confirmed in a larger group, may serve as
a single test in the follow-up of low risk patients treated for differentiated
thyroid carcinoma.
Van Tol et al., Groningen, The Netherlands, retrospectively studied
504 patients initially treated by total thyroidectomy and in 97% of cases with
additional 131-I ablation during a mean follow-up of 9 years. At 3 months after
initial treatment ablation was successful in 85 % of patients. After 6 months no
further intervention was done in 59 % of patients. At the end of the study survival
was 87 %. Tumor recurrence rate was 8.5 %. Risk factors for recurrence were older
age, extrathyroidal growth, and follicular or Hürthle cell subtype. Malinsky et
al., Strasbourg, France, report the results of radiofrequency treatment of bone
metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in 4 patients. Two patients
were followed for more than one year and showed a decrease in Tg level from 13,600 to
866 ng/ml and from 390 to 4.3 ng/ml. Comment: Although really very preliminary the
findings in these two patients are encouraging and should stimulate others to expand
this experience in patients who can not otherwise be treated for bone
metastases).
Schvartz et al., Reims, France, analyzed the thyroid cancer registry
from an administrative area of 850,000 inhabitants in France. In 1,462 patients
thyroid cancer was histologically confirmed. The patients were detected between1975
and 2001. In this period the age standardized incidence rate for all
thyroid cancer increased from 4.99 to 12.59 per 100,000 for females and from 1.04 to
3.69 for males. The proportion of papillary cancer increased from 47.7 % to 78.9 %,
and of follicular cancer decreased from 25.3% to 12.2 %. There was a tremendous
increase for small thyroid cancers (pT1) from 9% to 42 % and a small decrease for
larger cancers (pT2) from 39.3% to 36.8 %. Comment: The authors mention
several factors as an explanation for the increase in total cancer rate, all related
to better diagnostic criteria and tools. It would be interesting to analyze as well
if there are differences in mortality. I would not be surprised if a decrease would
be the case. Because if diagnostic methods become more sensitive and more specific,
and therefore treatment results improve one may expect a decrease in
mortality. However if, despite this, overall mortality appears to be increased this
may then be explained by an absolute increase incidence and/or aggressiveness of
thyroid carcinoma.
Newbold et al., Sutton, UK, compared survival of patients with
familial (54 patients) or sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) (72
patients). Survival at 10 years was significantly better in patients with MEN
syndrome (83%) compared with isolated familial MTC (67 %) or with sporadic
MTC (54.6 %). This difference persisted at 15 and 20 years (p=0.04). The authors
conclude that the prognosis of familial disease is better and explained
this because of earlier age at diagnosis (because of the genetic suspicion) and
therefore the earlier stage of the disease when treated.
|
|