|
| |
The question of whether subclinical hyperthyroidism
should be treated remains controversial
15,56 . To date, large, long-term randomized trials
examining this question have not been carried
out. Clinical manifestations of subclinical hyperthyroidism
can be managed without antithyroid
therapies: osteoporosis can be treated with estrogen
replacement and bisphosphonates, and tachycardia
with beta-blockers. However, once a persistently
suppressed TSH level has been documented,
the goal of specific therapy is to
normalize the serum TSH using small doses of
thiamazole/methimazole (MMI), carbimazole
(CBI), or propylthiouracil (PTU). Definitive therapy
with 131 I may be carried out, especially in
patients with goiter, although large doses may be
required in the setting of normal 24-hour radioactive
iodine uptakes. The thyroid 131 I uptake may
be enhanced by the prior administration of
recombinant human TSH 57,58 . If the serum TSH is
low during therapy for hypothyroidism (in non-thyroid
cancer patients), the dose of L-T 4 should
be decreased every 3–4 months until the serum
TSH normalizes. Treatment with anti-thyroid
drugs has been shown to have a beneficial effect
on osteoporosis in two small studies 59,60 . Additionally,
treatment of subclinical hyperthyroidism
does seem to decrease the risk for atrial fibrillation
56 . Some authors 61,6 advocate aggressive treatment
for subclinical hyperthyroidism, while others
suggest a policy of watchful waiting, deferring
treatment until the hyperthyroidism becomes
overt 15,62 . Samuels suggests that good candidates
for treatment include elderly patients with unexplained
weight loss, women with osteopenia, and
those with additional known risk factors for atrial
fibrillation 9 .
|
|