|
| |
Lavado et
al., Madrid and Cáceres, Spain, reported about the results of
iodine prophylaxis that was instituted in 1984 in the region of
Las Hurdes. Data were collected between 1980 and 1994. Iodine
excretion in school children increased from 26 to 106 µg/l.
Goitre frequency decreased from 78 to 11% and serum T4 increased
from 7.9 to 11.1 µg/l. Goitre grade decreased from III to I.
Weight and height became normal as well as scores in the
Bender-Gestalt and tapping tests. Mental development however was
lower as compared to controls: 85% below mean as compared to 50%
in controls. To find an explanation for the IQ retardation,
several studies were performed. Hearing acuity was normal by air
transmission, however decreased by bone transmission and occurred
bilaterally. Also urinary iodine excretion in pregnant women was
lower than expected on the basis of iodine excretion in children
and goitre frequency from the same area. The authors conclude
that only 6% of school children and 47% of pregnant women had
sufficient iodine prophylaxis. Unless effective measures are
taken, decreased mental development and hearing acuity might
persist despite the fact of marked amelioration of iodine
deficiency as reflected by decrease in goitre rate and grade.
(Comment: This is an important study as it indicates that it is
not sufficient to judge success of iodine prophylaxis only on the
basis of decrease of goitre prevalence. Other parameters like
iodine excretion especially in children and pregnant women are
pertinent to measure as well.)
Zimmermann et al., Zurich, Switzerland, and
Abidjan, Ivory Coast, assessed the effect of iodine
supplementation to two groups of children (age 612 years)
with goitre. Group I (n = 51) were children without anaemia (Hb
> 12 g/dl), group II (n = 53) were children with iron
deficient anaemia (Hb < 11 g/dl). All children in both groups
received a single oral dose of 0.4 ml iodised poppyseed oil
containing 200 mg of iodine. Prevalence of goitre at 30 weeks
after intervention in group I and group II was 12% and 64%
respectively. At the same time mean percentage decrease in
thyroid volume was 45% and 21% respectively. Percentage decrease
of thyroid volume correlated with haemoglobin concentration (r =
0.65). TSH decreased and T4 increased in group I but was
unchanged 30 weeks after intervention in group II. The authors
conclude that when iron deficient anaemia is present, the
therapeutic response to oral iodised oil is impaired. (Comment:
This study raises interesting points. First, if iron deficiency
is present, this should be corrected as well in iodine
prophylaxis. Secondly, does iron play an essential role in
thyroid hormone synthesis or is impairment of this process
indirectly caused by iron deficiency e.g. by decreased absorption
of administered iodine?)
De Santiago et al., Madrid, Spain, treated 93
pregnant women from an area with mild (grade I) iodine deficiency
with 150 µg iodine daily in tablet form. A control group of 419
pregnant women from the same area served as control. In the
iodine treated women mean urinary iodine excretion in the second
and third trimester of pregnancy equilibrated around 200 µg/l.
In the control group this value was around 90 µg/l. FT4 serum
levels averaged in the same pregnancy period in the iodine
treated women around 15.5 pmol/l, whereas this value was around
12.8 in the non-treated group. Furthermore, maternal and neonatal
thyroid volume were significantly reduced in the iodine treated
group. The authors conclude that in an area with apparently mild
iodine deficiency circulating FT4 does not reach values found in
women with adequate iodine intake. (Comment: The same group of
authors found evidence in rats, that brain development of the
neonates is predominantly depending on intracerebral T4 levels
that are lowered when serum FT4 is low. I also like to point to
the recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine and the
accompanying editorial: vol. 341, no. 8, 1999, where it is shown
that maternal hypothyroidism results in retarded
neuropsychological development of the child. In this study the
mean FT4 concentration of hypothyroid women was 73% of normal,
whereas in the present report the mean FT4 value in untreated
women was 82% of iodine treated women. These values are not
grossly different, suggesting that even in mild iodine deficiency
mental development of progeny is at risk (See also editorial
Lancet, Oct. 9,1999). The present report is therefore very
important and indicates that a situation of even "only"
mild iodine deficiency is not acceptable for the community).
Gärtner et al., Berlin, Heidelberg, Munich,
Germany, conducted an epidemiological survey of iodine intake and
excretion in 26 regions distributed representatively throughout
Germany. They found a good correlation between calculated iodine
intake and actually measured urinary iodine excretion. Severe
iodine deficiency (urinary iodine <5 µg/dl) was found in 21%
of recruits, 20% of senior citizens, 49% of new-borns from
mothers not taking iodine, and 21% of mothers taking 200 µg
iodine per day. These values were for moderate iodine deficiency
(5 to 9.9 µg/dl) 42%, 35%, 32%, and 35%. Iodine sufficiency (>
10 µg/dl) was found in 38%, 45%, 20%, and 44% respectively. The
authors state that calculation of iodine intake is a valid method
for monitoring iodine supply in a survey. Secondly, they consider
Germany still as an iodine deficient country. (Comment: It is
fortunate that this survey was supported by the German Ministry
of Health. I hope that the results stimulate the politicians to
implement iodine prophylaxis more efficiently in Germany).
Erdogan et al., Ankara, Turkey, and Brussels,
Belgium, assessed thyroid volume (TV) and schoolmarks (SM) in
1226 schoolchildren between 9 and 11 years old from different
areas in Turkey with varying grades of severe iodine deficiency
(median urinary iodine concentration between 14 µg/l to 30.5
µg/l). SM was found to be inversely correlated to iodine
excretion. In the sense that good results were obtained by 58% of
control children with sufficient iodine intake (urinary iodine
concentration > 100 µg/l) while this value was 26% in severe
iodine deficiency (urinary iodine concentration <19
µg/l).
There were several reports
from different regions in Europe still indicating the presence of
iodine deficiency. These were from Pankiv et
al., Chernivtsi, Ukraine, showing the beneficial effect of iodine
prophylaxis on thyroid volume in that area. From Berontiene
et al., Kaunas, Lithuania, and Brussels, Belgium, who showed
that, although moderately to severe iodine deficiency was present
in two areas that they studied in Lithuania (median urinary
iodine excretion in pregnant women 3.8 µg/dl), serum TSH was
inappropriately elevated in new-borns, suggesting the presence of
additional environmental goitrogens. From Pinna
et al., Cagliari, Italy, who showed that in mild iodine
deficiency not only goitre prevalence was increased especially
beyond 50 years of age, but also the presence of thyroid nodules
in this age group who had otherwise normal thyroid volume. From Paggi
et al., Rome, Italy, who after an epidemiological survey,
classified Southern Latium, Italy, as an area of moderate to
severe iodine deficiency, and from Knudsen et
al., Aalborg, Denmark, who reported ultrasonographic measurements
of thyroid volume form inhabitants of a region with mild and a
region with borderline iodine deficiency. Thyroid nodules were
equally present in both areas (around 30%), but increased thyroid
volume was present in 23% of subjects with moderate iodine
deficiency (median urinary iodine concentration 48 µg/l) and in
15% with borderline iodine deficiency (median urinary iodine
concentration 61µg/l). From Bourdoux et al.,
Brussels, Belgium, who investigated the effects of 5 years of
iodine prophylaxis in a previous iodine deficient area in Central
Africa. Due to iodine prophylaxis, goitre rate decreased from 54%
to 5%. Median urinary iodine excretion was 44 µg/dl and 42% of
the population had concentrations of >50 µg/ml. Undetectable
TSH with normal T4 (subclinical hyperthyroidism) was present in
3.2% of the population whereas undetectable TSH with elevated T4
amounted to exactly the same percentage. All but one hyperthyroid
subjects were younger than 40 years of age and had no goitre. The
authors stated that there were tremendous variations in iodine
content of salt samples with 40% of them exceeding the new
recommendations of WHO. This fact was considered as the cause of
the high percentage of the population found to have a suppressed
TSH. (Comment: It is remarkable that subclinical or overt
hyperthyroidism was present in young people without goitre or
nodules whereas one would expect this to be the case in old
people with autonomous nodules. Furthermore, I find the
prevalence of suppressed TSH of 6.4% unexpectedly high. From the
classical studies in Northern Tasmania on induced hyperthyroidism
after iodine prophylaxis we find in the first place that this
mainly occurred in subjects over 40 years and then in a
percentage of "only" 0.125 [Connolly et al., Lancet 1;
500, 1970].)
|
|