|
| |
There is still no consensus on the best treatment for Graves
disease. In the USA 131I is the preferred therapy in adults, while ATD are favored in
Europe and Japan (8), although less than 50% will achieve long-term remission by this
therapy. 131I is thought to be the most cost-effective therapy. Advantages and
disadvantages are given in table 3.
Generally, oral 131I doses of 100 µCi (3.7 MBq) per gram
thyroid tissue corrected for a 100% 24 h 131I uptake have been given (9). This will
approximately render 70% of patients euthyroid within 3 months, given that antithyroid
drugs are not resumed. Roughly 70% are cured with one dose and 90% with two doses. It is
generally believed that pretreatment as well as post treatment with ATD decreases the
effect of 131I4. Prospective randomized studies on how many days ATD have to be withdrawn,
if at all, and whether there is a difference between carbimazole, methimazole and
propylthiouracil are lacking.
Table 2: Contraindications for radioiodine treatment in benign thyroid disease
Absolute contraindications
Relative contraindications
- Young subjects
- Intrathoracic and/or very large goitre
- Endocrine ophthalmopathy
The risk of hypothyroidism depends on the 131I dose. The lower
the dose, the lower the incidence of hypothyroidism within the first year of therapy and
the higher the frequency of persistent hyperthyroidism. Using the above dose-algorithm
some 20% of patients will become hypothyroid within the first year, while myxedema
incidence beyond the first year seems at large uninfluenced by 131I dose at 23% per
year (9,10). The risk of hypothyroidism is roughly 50% after 10 years and if given at a
young age inevitably causes hypothyroidism (5,9,10). Based on the existing information, it
could be speculated whether a meticulously calculated 131I dose is cost-effective and
worth while (10,11).
Thyroid size reduction has received little attention. Thyroid volume
determined ultrasonically can be reduced by approximately 5060% within
one year (9), with little subsequent reduction. Roughly, half of this decrease is seen
within 3 months of therapy (9). There is no significant acute increase in thyroid volume
or obstructive symptoms, after 131I administration12. Normalization of thyroid volume
irrespective of initial thyroid size (9) is the rule, and secondary increase
in thyroid volume should not be anticipated, except in the patient affected by radiation
thyroiditis, which is rare. The initial 131I dose reduces thyroid volume in all patients,
also in patients needing subsequent 131I doses due to persistent hyperthyroidism. The dose
can be repeated and additional thyroid volume reduction expected. Thyroid volume reduction
is generally higher in patients becoming hypothyroid than in those remaining eu- or
hyperthyroid (9).
Radiation thyroiditis is seen in few percent within the first months
of 131I-therapy and easily treated with salicylates or corticosteroids. Recent evidence
unequivocally demonstrates that 131I-treatment in Graves disease carries a risk of
development or worsening of ophthalmopathy in 15% of patients (5% needing treatment) (13).
This worsening is often transient and can be prevented by the administration of
prednisolone (13). While this study may indicate that the combination of 131I and
prednisolone should have a more prominent place in the therapy of Graves
hyperthyroidism with eye-symptoms, only 6% of European Thyroid Association (ETA) members
would prefer this treatment14. Active ophthalmopathy is thus regarded by most ETA members
as a relative contraindication for 131I-therapy.
The overwhelming majority of young patients with hyperthyroidism
have Graves disease (15). Since remission rates on ATD are lower in young subjects
than in adults, 131I-therapy has been used also in children (15). Although used down to
the age of 5 by some, and the rarity of thyroid malignancy in 131I-treated children (4
reported cases) (15), we are reluctant to administer this therapy for subjects below 20
years of age. However, as data on side-effects accumulates we, as have others, have
treated younger and younger subjects. There is at present no consensus as to a lowest age
limit.
|
|