|
| |
Bone
Gómez Acotto et al., Buenos Aires, Argentina, and Lyon, France,
measured bone mass, using ultrasound assessment of the calcaneus and body
composition, and bone mineral density by DEXA in 24 untreated hyperthyroid
women. Both, ultrasound results and DEXA bone mineral density values, were
similarly decreased in hyperthyroid patients. Lean tissue and fat mass
were also decreased as measured by DEXA. The authors conclude that in this
study the ultrasound technique is the first application for measuring bone
mass in patients with hyperthyroidism, showing its potential for future
application.
Brucker-Davis et al., Bethesda, MD, measured bone density in 9 females
and 8 males with resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH). In this familial
syndrome sensitiviy to thyroid hormone is decreased because of a mutation
in the gene of the á receptor of thyroid hormone. It is known that
in hypothyroidism, when it occurs in childhood, stature may be short and
this occurs also in about 20% of patients with RTH. In the here reported
study bone mineral density was measured of the lumbar spine, femur and
radius. Seven subjects had bone mineral density below 2 SD and 8 below
1 SD. Spine and femur were equally affected and more often than the radius.
Both genders were equally affected and a correlation was found between
the percentile of the height and bone mineral density at the level of the
spin.
Heart
Biondi et al., Naples, Italy, performed Doppler echocardiography in 83
patients with variable degree of hyper- and hypothyroidism. They found
left ventricular mass to be increased in overt hypothyroidism and longterm
subclinical hyperthyroidism. Heart rate was increased in subclinical- and
overt hyperthroidism, and reduced in overt hypothyroidism. Systolic function
was increased in both types of hyperthyroidism. Aortic acceleration (change
in the acceleration of aortic blood flow with stress testing) was increased
in subclinical- and clinical hyperthyroidism and decreased in hypothyroidism.
Both, circumferential fiber shortening and aortic acceleration, showed
a significant direct correlation with FT3 and FT4, and those indices are
thus very useful as a biological index of thyroid hormone.
Shapiro et al., New York, NY, duplicated studies by Biondi et al. from
Italy (JCEM 77: 334, 1993 and 80: 2222, 1995) where they tested the effect
of suppressive doses of T4 on heart performence. The dose of T4 was titrated
to just suppress serum TSH to 0.01 mU/mL. In the Italian study various
effects were found: increased values of: basal heart rate, incidence of
atrial extrasystoles, interventricular septal thickness, and left ventricular
mass index, while diastolic heart function was impaired. In the present
study, performed in 17 athyreotic patients who were treated with suppressive
T4 with a mean duration of 8.0 years, only an increased left ventricular
mass index was found. The authors conclude that, as an increased left ventricular
mass index without impaired heart function seems to have no clinical consequences,
that T4 may be prescribed in suppressive doses without clinical consequence.
(Comment: The gross discrepancies between this study and the Italian studies
are not easy to explain. The mean T4 dose per kg bodyweight in the New
York study was quite similar to that in the Italian studies.)
Mohr-Kahaly et al., Mainz, Germany, performed dynamic stress echocardiography
and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 42 patients with hyperthyroidism
before treatment and also after 3 months of euthyroidism. The most important
finding was an impaired chronotropic response during exercise in hyperthyroidism,
and the authors conclude that this might be the primary limiting factor
of reduced work capacity that is present in untreated hyperthyroidism.
|
|